Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Alberta Election

Collapse
X
Collapse
  •  

  • Alberta Election

    An Alberta General Election is expected in the next fifteen months, most probably in early 2012. Popular wisdom and the mass media say that Ed Stelmach’s Progressive Conservative government is in trouble, having fumbled the ball on various policy issues, from medicare, through the Monty Python-like oil and gas royalty review, to poor oversight of oil sands’ phasing and their environmental impact. Their story line is that the Wildrose Alliance Party (WAP) is running even with the PCs in public opinion polls and could form the next government. But a recent opinion poll commissioned by the Democratic Renewal Project (DRP) tells an entirely different story.

    Other opposition parties – the Greens (Vision 2012), Liberals and New Democrats - also sense the window of opportunity and make brave statements about their potential, because the conservative or right-wing vote will be split between the two front-runners. Their problem is, however, that the longstanding split of the “progressive” vote among the three parties will be exacerbated by the addition of the Alberta Party to the field. Wishful thinking aside, are these four parties making any headway?
    The DRP – a grassroots organization of Albertans from all parties devoted to replacing the present government with a progressive alternative – recently hired Leger Marketing to do a public opinion poll on Albertans’ provincial party preferences. Leger found some surprising results. In a telephone survey of 891 eligible voter respondents, Albertans broke out as follows: PC 26%, Undecided 25%, Liberal 14%, WAP 13%, New Democrat 6%, Green Party 4%, Alberta Party 1%, Other 1%. (“Will Not Vote” and “Refuse to Answer” made up the rest.) Among DECIDED voters, support levels were: PC 39%, Liberal 21%, WAP 20%, New Democrat 10%, Green Party 7%, Alberta Party 2%, Other 1%.

    According to this poll, not only is WAP’s support way below the Conservatives, but a hair less than the Liberals’! Furthermore, the potential combined progressive vote equals that of the leading Conservatives. What gives?

    Several explanations for these dramatically different results are possible. First, maybe polls are not reliable – as John Diefenbaker once punned, “polls” are of interest only to dogs. Second, WAP’s support may originally have been higher because people parked their votes there when initially moving away from the Conservatives. Now they are willing to look at some other possibilities. Third, the initial surge of enthusiasm for the new “true” conservative WAP has faded as people realize that the old mantra that “that government is best which governs least” is obsolete. Fourth, the results do not appear to capture the increased interest in the Alberta Party, which as the enthusiastic new kid on the block, is gaining support daily.
    The strength of the potential progressive vote should not be a surprise. In the 2008 election, the combined vote for the Green, Liberal and New Democratic Parties exceeded that for the Conservatives in twelve constituencies where the latter won. It was almost as high in several others. In fact, the strong Conservative win (72 of 83 seats) was accomplished with only 52.6% of the total votes cast. 47.4% -- close to half – did not vote for the Conservatives last time round. Many Albertans would agree that electoral reform is needed – probably some version of Proportional Representation. Of course the present government has no interest in this as it benefits from our dysfunctional first-past-the-post system.

    But more relevant for the results of this survey is that only 41% of eligible Albertans voted in the last election. We don’t know how non-voters would have exercised their franchise but surely a significant reason for not voting was that there was no point – we always get the same result anyway. DRP wants to change that. DRP first tried to get the centre-left parties to negotiate a “non-compete” agreement and allocate exclusive candidacies to whichever of them has the best chance to win in promising constituencies. Such a combination could eventually – if not in 2012 then next time – take over government and implement PR.

    This non-compete idea did not gain much support (only the Liberals showed any interest), so the DRP has moved to “Plan B”. It will endorse the strongest progressive candidate, regardless of party, and recommend strategic voting for that person. It plans to offer constituency-by -constituency analyzes and endorsements. The Leger poll suggests that such an approach could be fruitful and give discouraged voters on the centre-left reason to return to polling booths in 2012.

    Almost certainly, 2011 will be a volatile year in Alberta politics. Remembering Calgary Centre’s strategic voting in the 2000 federal election for PC Joe Clark in an “Anybody but the Alliance” surge, similar decisions by voters in the coming Alberta election may surprise both the Conservatives and WAP. Mayor Naheed Nenshi’s win in Calgary shows that intelligent, thoughtful politics can succeed in Alberta. It can’t come to the provincial level too soon.

    -- Phil Elder, Calgary Co-chair of the DRP

    • moahunter
      #1
      moahunter commented
      Editing a comment
      All I can say, having lived under FPP and PR, is thank god we aren't going to get PR anytime soon. The problem is not the system (one that has contributed to Canada and Alberta being one of the most wealthy countries/provinces on earth), it is the politicians. Changing the systems won't change the politicians. Just because you don't like the party in power, isn't a reason to change the rules.

    • armin
      #2
      armin commented
      Editing a comment
      I don't believe the WRA has as much power as they say they do.

    • Turtle
      #3
      Turtle commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by armin
      I don't believe the WRA has as much power as they say they do.

      All they have is a leader that talks and talks and then talks some more.
    Posting comments is disabled.

Categories

Collapse

article_tags

Collapse

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • Edmonton’s future needs fixing; 16-year-old has suggestions
    by NoreneS
    Hi my name is Logan Lehune. I’m 16-year-old student at McNally High School. I would like to give my take on the state of Edmonton and its future. I am very passionate about Edmonton and its future and I am very actively involved with the city to try to do my part to make it better. But I feel that if Edmonton does not change fast we will fall behind on the global stage. Darwin said: "It is not the strongest who survive, but the ones who most adapt to change.” And the world is changing ra...
    30-06-2016, 02:07 AM
  • Edmonton Ward 6 Candidate > Bryan Kapitza
    by NoreneS
    New Ideas

    We all know of the challenges that our city faces: urban sprawl, unresponsive government, a deteriorating downtown.
    The citizens of Edmonton expect their elected representatives to be offer innovative and visionary solutions to these problems.

    Here are a few ideas that I see as having significant benefit to our communities.

    Property Tax Reform Presently our taxes are based on the value of our land and on the improvements on that land, i.e.,...
    30-06-2016, 01:43 AM
  • I Stand for Law and Order and Fiscal Responsibility
    by NoreneS
    I was educated at New York University where I earned a Bachelor of Science Degree and Masters Degree in Business Administration majoring in Marketing and Finance. Several years later I obtained a Law Degree from the University of British Columbia. I have been a Chemical Analyst - Labor Relations Manager and contract negotiator, for both Multi National and Crown Corporations, Prosecutor and Defense Council. In my view the city administration is a nightmare and needs a turn around...
    30-06-2016, 01:42 AM
  • Edmonton Public School Board Trustee Candidate for Ward C - Christopher Spencer
    by NoreneS
    Old Green Grovenor is going into politics. I’m running for public school board trustee in Ward C, which includes most of west-central Edmonton. Elections for this office typically receive little media coverage and often voters won’t complete the education part of the ballot. Those who do vote sometimes make their selection based on name recognition, not policy. For example, the candidate with the alphabetical order advantage, thus being listed first among the nominees, is about 20 per cent mo...
    30-06-2016, 01:28 AM
  • Edmonton is too “sexy"
    by NoreneS
    Edmonton is too "sexy" Edmonton the “Sexual Assault Capital of Canada,” is quite different from our welcome to Edmonton “City of Champions” catch phrase but this beautiful city’s dirty little shame took this title in 1975. With the highest sexual assault rate per capita, something had to happen. A year later, the sexual assault centre of Edmonton (SACE) began. Its mission statement says it all, the centre exists “to empower individuals affected by sexual abuse and assault, and to emp...
    30-06-2016, 01:24 AM
  • Edmonton is too “sexy"
    by NoreneS
    Edmonton is too "sexy" Edmonton the “Sexual Assault Capital of Canada,” is quite different from our welcome to Edmonton “City of Champions” catch phrase but this beautiful city’s dirty little shame took this title in 1975. With the highest sexual assault rate per capita, something had to happen. A year later, the sexual assault centre of Edmonton (SACE) began. Its mission statement says it all, the centre exists “to empower individuals affected by sexual abuse and assault, and to emp...
    30-06-2016, 01:20 AM
Working...
X