No announcement yet.

So you hate groupthink?


  • So you hate groupthink?

    So you hate groupthink? So you think the forum has a specific bias? So you think that one opinion prevails overall?

    You couldn’t be further from the truth. Just because there aren’t a plethora of people posting here opposing a specific position on a building, project, parade, or any other event or project DOES NOT MEAN your opinion on the contrary side is not appreciated or welcomed. The reality of Internet forums is that only certain people will use them. The reality of Internet forums is that until somebody gets angry enough, or passionate enough, they will not post. That’s just reality.

    This is the core of the problem here on Connect2Edmonton and many other forums. Don’t think for one second that I don’t frequent many other forums. Political forums, automotive forums, aviation forums, scientific and research forums, home renovation forums, and even those on Airshows. They all share a similar issue. They only have the content of those who wish to post. Connect2Edmonton has long been dominated by a pro-development, pro-downtown, pro-density crowd. This is not surprising given that its founding years were in the midst of a very depressed Edmonton economy, with absolutely no downtown development in years, with serious concerns about its place on the provincial stage let alone the world stage, and an overall civic lethargy and self-deprecation habit. Many of those posters are still very active today and are rather proud of the changes that have happened downtown. That’s good and that is their right to be proud.

    The current agenda of many cities as a whole, not just Edmonton, is largely urbanist in nature. This does not mean that a suburban and rural agenda is somehow inferior or being shot down. Far more people live in suburban and rural areas than ever will live in a downtown dense core for the foreseeable future. Far more people will appreciate and enjoy the automobile than public transit for the foreseeable future.

    Recent comments saying that Connect2Edmonton really is nothing but groupthink is not a reflection of moderation but more reflection of those who choose to participate. The agenda of Edmonton as the city has been very focused on downtown since the days of Mayor Bill Smith. That momentum permeates the city’s administration and also permeates the planning and development proposals put forth to City Council for review. It really explains wholeheartedly the rabid desire for many unobtainable items in projects such as the Blatchford redevelopment concept. However, continuing to use the Blatchford redevelopment concept as an example, you will see many of the “unobtanium” contained within the original concept has been beaten into submission by reality. This will also hold true to many of the other ideas and/or concepts that are put forth for downtown and other areas.

    One cannot moderate away groupthink. Since this forum is open to all opinions, all opinions are welcomed. If one constituency wishes to overwhelm the forum of their opinion, that is their right. I cannot moderate that away any more than I can moderate away your own opinion. To ask me to do so would be disingenuous.

    That said, the only way Connect2Edmonton will get more diverse opinions is if more diverse opinions post. If you’re upset and believe that there is groupthink, then feel free to actively recruit others to post on Connect2Edmonton. If you think there is a hive mentality, invite another hive. From its inception, Connect2Edmonton was supposed to be an all-inclusive form. It is still open to everyone to post their opinion.

    If you need some survival tips on navigating an Internet form, check out the following

    • Most people posting on forums don’t have direct control over the projects they seem to dislike,
    • an opinion is just that, an opinion,
    • be articulate in your replies. You do not need to in to your comments with a snarky little add-on no matter how much you dislike the previous post. You know that’s just going to inflame,
    • if you have a bias, do not be afraid to admit it. Embrace it. It is your opinion and your bias. Just be prepared for your bias to be challenged, and
    • relax. The world is not going to change with the post on Connect2Edmonton, but your opinion does have influence for the tens of thousands of readers who frequent the site. Most of the people who donated to the Connect2Edmonton fund were not posters. They were readers. They were lurkers. They were passionate and continue to be passionate consumers of your information. As I said before, just because they don’t post…

    When it comes to moderation, we’ve had a standing principle that if you’re an active participant in a thread that you should not moderate that thread. It is a core reason of why I don’t actively participate in many threads anymore. I’m trying to keep some cognitive distance as many of the moderators are no longer here. Moderation takes a lot of patience, and on this forum, more patience than normal. I am reinforcing that rule effective immediately. I’ve also reduce the moderator count to just me and one other.

    A few years ago, due to the baiting of one poster, we put out there who the moderators were as far as the user names. That was a colossal mistake. Since that day, some posters have been doing nothing but baiting those who moderate into a position where they have to make a decision and then they turn around to decry being moderated. When I recruit new moderators, they will be moderator 1 through moderator 10. I will personally review all infractions to make sure a username who is using moderator one through 10 is not abusing this privilege. And yes, I will be recruiting new moderators.

    As for a topic that is the subject of much of the groupthink dilemma…

    Edmonton’s Metro area is over 1 million people. Do 1 million people live in the downtown core? Do 1 million people bother to visit the downtown core? The answer is no. While there are many people posting on this form who are very pro-density, very pro-downtown, very pro-historical preservation, and very pro-phallic shiny glass encrusted towers as a symbol of progress, there are many others who read this form who do not visit downtown, who do not think downtown is for everyone, who don’t work downtown, who will never live downtown, and who don’t “appreciate” some of the directions that the city is taking. All one needs to see are the differing opinions being expressed in letters to the editor from everything photo radar, to parking, too many other issues.

    Even the author of this article has left downtown. I personally grew tired of the groupthink, of being told what a “good downtown” really is. I found downtown to be an absolute hell for a person with disabilities which should be the exact opposite if I were to listen to the downtown boosters. I’ve since moved to an area where I can control my environment more to help in my life as being a disabled person. Downtown, especially in the winter, became an absolute prison. That is just my opinion. I moved from my own reasons. I would not dare tell people to not live downtown because of my experience.

    On a personal note, I’ve always known that Edmonton is far more than is downtown core. While in the late 1990s, the downtown really was being a defining metaphor for many things “wrong” with Edmonton’s current position at the time. However, I knew (as well as many others who are no longer posting here) that Edmonton was the sum of its parts and eventually should not be defined by its core alone. In fact, the very design of the Connect2Edmonton regional plan reflects this reality. If you go back and read that plan, you will see that the core of the borough concept was to have downtown be its own district and planned as its own district so that other districts could plan the medium to low density developments that, via anecdotal evidence, the majority of purchasers in this part of North America prefer.

    I too have noticed and commented on some of the rather interesting examples of doublespeak when it comes to density, massing, and neighbourhood appropriateness. There is the double standard regardless of what certain area boosters will tell you. It’s like the old saying of one man’s junk is another man’s treasure, or one terrorist is another’s freedom fighter. It all depends on what side of the fence you’re on the topic of the day. What gets me upset, is when the bias isn’t admitted. The difference is that I will point it out, but will not let it permeate other threads as the new thread is about something else. To repeat, there are many people reading this form and they get the bias, they read the comment pointing out the bias, and they’re good. There is no need to keep repeating it.

    To sum up, this community is only as good as those who post. Reading is fine and is welcomed. Using this as a repository for Edmonton is welcomed. However, if you don’t like the tone or the direction of a conversation, login and post a very well rationed and reasoned response. Don’t call names, don’t bait, don’t add the snippy taglines, and you should be just fine. If you don’t like the lack of conversation on topics you’d like to see on Connect2Edmonton, login and start the topic. If you want more people to talk on here, invite them. If you have a bias, just admit it – it’ll come out anyway.

    Thank you. Thank you to those who support the site, and thank you to those who supported us in the past.

    Sorry for the length of the article.

    • Spudly
      Spudly commented
      Editing a comment
      Originally posted by Gemini
      ^Yeah but now and again that person on your ignore list just might post something very enlightening or even intelligent. You could disagree with 99% of that persons opinions but there could be that one thread where your in perfect harmony with them. Scary, I know.
      I'm afraid "now and again" multiplied by "just might" multiplied by "agree with 1%" is a very very small amount of signal. A near-zero return on my investment. Add in a dig about what's scary and that drops right to zero.

    • Gemini
      Gemini commented
      Editing a comment
      Oh well.

    • dwells
      dwells commented
      Editing a comment
      Connect2Edmonton has long been dominated by a pro-development, pro-downtown, pro-density crowd.
      Add to that the ludicrous desire to copy in our climate certain facilities that were iconic in cities in tropical climates.

      That part I could deal with, but I was worn down by the "city administration is right" mantra and the "cost is no hindrance, we have lots of taxpayers" attitude of many of the pro-everything crowd coupled with the abuse they piled on those of us who were cost conscious.

      I am back after a prolonged hiatus - we'll see if anything has changed.
    Posting comments is disabled.





Latest Articles


  • Photo radar shadowing campaign. Cash Cow Extravaganza
    by RichardS
    A local group has started a campaign to highlight what they feel is an unjust and inappropriate method of raising funds via photo radar.

    Details from their facebook page

    What do you think?

    This article was posted to generate discussion and does not imply support for or condemnation of any action in their campaign on the part of Connect2Edmonton....
    16-08-2016, 02:05 PM
  • So you hate groupthink?
    by RichardS
    So you hate groupthink? So you think the forum has a specific bias? So you think that one opinion prevails overall?

    You couldn’t be further from the truth. Just because there aren’t a plethora of people posting here opposing a specific position on a building, project, parade, or any other event or project DOES NOT MEAN your opinion on the contrary side is not appreciated or welcomed. The reality of Internet forums is that only certain people will use them. The reality of Internet forums...
    16-08-2016, 10:26 AM
  • C2E - powered by YEG TEL
    by RichardS
    YEGTEL is now a key partner in the C2E domain. I must admit the logo is a bit of a throwback! As you notice by the banner, C2E is now hosted by a local company. Having our servers in Canada again has a definite advantage as the previous set up was in Seattle. Patriot act is one, payments in CAD is another... Max at YEGTEL approached me while I was laid up in the hospital, and demonstrated his company's desire to partner. It took some time to make this happen as I knew the upgrade was going t...
    05-07-2016, 07:21 AM
  • Edmonton’s future needs fixing; 16-year-old has suggestions
    by NoreneS
    Hi my name is Logan Lehune. I’m 16-year-old student at McNally High School. I would like to give my take on the state of Edmonton and its future. I am very passionate about Edmonton and its future and I am very actively involved with the city to try to do my part to make it better. But I feel that if Edmonton does not change fast we will fall behind on the global stage. Darwin said: "It is not the strongest who survive, but the ones who most adapt to change.” And the world is changing ra...
    30-06-2016, 02:07 AM
  • Edmonton Ward 6 Candidate > Bryan Kapitza
    by NoreneS
    New Ideas

    We all know of the challenges that our city faces: urban sprawl, unresponsive government, a deteriorating downtown.
    The citizens of Edmonton expect their elected representatives to be offer innovative and visionary solutions to these problems.

    Here are a few ideas that I see as having significant benefit to our communities.

    Property Tax Reform Presently our taxes are based on the value of our land and on the improvements on that land, i.e.,...
    30-06-2016, 01:43 AM
  • I Stand for Law and Order and Fiscal Responsibility
    by NoreneS
    I was educated at New York University where I earned a Bachelor of Science Degree and Masters Degree in Business Administration majoring in Marketing and Finance. Several years later I obtained a Law Degree from the University of British Columbia. I have been a Chemical Analyst - Labor Relations Manager and contract negotiator, for both Multi National and Crown Corporations, Prosecutor and Defense Council. In my view the city administration is a nightmare and needs a turn around...
    30-06-2016, 01:42 AM