Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Is it time to licence and restrict all boats to assigned lakes and rivers

  1. #1

    Default Is it time to licence and restrict all boats to assigned lakes and rivers

    Since we're facing incredibly costly invasive species risks does Alberta have to think about measures to prevent their spread among our bodies of water? So, should anyone with a boat have to restrict its use to a pre-assigned water body.

    i.e. if you have a cabin on pigeon lake, your boat has to stay there. If you have a boat in a city or town you have to get a lake specific license to use it only in that one water body in that season. If you want to move it somewhere else mid season you need to get it cleaned and 'treated'.


    Mussels close in on Alberta irrigation districts
    Posted Nov. 17th, 2016 by Barb Glen

    “If it does get into the upper St. Mary’s or gets into the upper Milk River … it’s a game changer. (There’s no) stopping it from getting into all the irrigation systems and water treatment plants basically from Cardston east to Medicine Hat.”

    Alberta government estimates show invasive mussels could cost the province $75 million in damages annually. The irrigation industry alone could see $8 million in annual costs to combat the mussels.

    http://www.producer.com/2016/11/muss...ion-districts/
    More on costs in general...
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0321195037.htm
    Last edited by KC; 17-11-2016 at 08:28 PM.

  2. #2

    Default

    I think they should try to tackle the problem other ways. In fact boats and boat motors may stop mussels from taking hold as they may like still waters to proliferate.
    Like mosquitoes, they don't like churning water so they don't lay eggs in it. Mussels may not spawn.
    "The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read." –Mark Twain

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gemini View Post
    I think they should try to tackle the problem other ways. In fact boats and boat motors may stop mussels from taking hold as they may like still waters to proliferate.
    Like mosquitoes, they don't like churning water so they don't lay eggs in it. Mussels may not spawn.
    You'd need a lot of boats in a lake to make a difference.

  4. #4
    I'd rather C2E than work!
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Edmonton (Norwood)
    Posts
    4,317

    Default

    ^^^ I think that would be going too far for Alberta while Alberta, BC and Saskatchewan are still free of invasive mussels, but Montana should be considering something like that now. The reservoir where they were found is not a direct threat (it is not upstream of anything in Canada and it is unlikely a boat would get through the international border without being inspected and decontaminated if necessary), but western Montana has St Mary lake (which drains to the Oldman river and could contaminate the entire South Saskatchewan) as well as the Koocanusa reservoir on the Kootenay river.

  5. #5

    Default

    They should find some mussels that carry a fatal disease. Infect the mussels and hope they die off. Or, try to render the males or females sterile although it seems their mating habits are pretty complicated.

    http://molluskconservation.org/MUSSE...roduction.html
    "The man who does not read has no advantage over the man who cannot read." –Mark Twain

  6. #6

    Default

    ^ good idea.

    Also I would say the time to restrict watercraft to one body of water is long overdue, obviously.
    Let's make Edmonton better.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •